Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 25;36(4-5):306–316. doi: 10.1177/15459683211065448

Table 2.

Comparison of Language Recovery in Patients with Subacute (NORTHSTAR) and Chronic (NORTHSTAR-CA) Post-Stroke Aphasia in the rTMS and Sham Stimulation Groups.

Change Relative to Baseline Subacute Phase Post-stroke (NORTHSTAR) Chronic Phase Post-stroke (NORTHSTAR-CA) Sham Chronic/Subacute Comparison rTMS Chronic/Subacute Comparison Stimulation x Phase (P values of Robust Median ANOVAs)
Sham N = 19 rTMS N = 20 Post-hoc P value Sham N = 14 rTMS N = 14 P value P value P value Stimulation Main Effect Phase Main Effect Interaction Effect
Naming (BNT total correct Z-score)
day 1 .73 (.94) .90 (1.19) .21 (1.08) .56 (1.69) .706 .839 .727 .406 .170 .455
day 30 1.02 (1.71) 1.91 (.77) rTMS>Sham (P = .046)* .61 (1.00) .15 (1.68) .706 .839 .015* .571 .004* <.001*
Verbal fluency (SF1min Z-score)
day 1 .00 (.20) .00 (.46) .17 (1.95) .26 (.71) 1.000 .839 .103 .845 .320 .634
day 30 .73 (1.14) .48 (.75) .17 (.49) .36 (.71) .706 .107 .727 .857 .060 .144
Comprehension (TT Z-score)
day 1 1.12 (1.87) .87 (1.99) .35 (1.75) .82 (2.10) .706 .02* .727 .836 .423 .430
day 30 2.07 (2.57) 1.54 (2.22) .93 (2.22) .47 (2.16) .706 .364 .145 .351 .036* .735
UnAS (percent change)
day 1 9.00 (19.9) 6.85 (17.7) 13.64 (46.60) 9.39 (25.48) .706 .616 .727 .788 .762 .886
day 30 15.40 (63.5) 26.25 (28.3) 6.51 (56.44) 12.53 (37.41) .257 .107 .296 .487 .352 .368

Post-treatment changes relative to baseline immediately after treatment (day 1), and at follow-up (day 30).

Medians (and interquartile ranges) are displayed for each subgroup as well as P values of median tests.

Significance level =.05.

BNT: Boston Naming Test; SF1min: semantic fluency test (animals in 1 minute); TT: 36-item Token Test; UnAS: unified aphasia score.

*Identifies P values <.05.