Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 12.
Published in final edited form as: Transfusion. 2015 Jan 9;55(6 Pt 2):1388–1393. doi: 10.1111/trf.12987

TABLE 1.

Prevalence of 23 antigens not routinely available by serologic testing*

Patients with SCD
Prevalence
Antigen Positive Negative Patients with SCD Blacks Caucasian

hrB 436 54 0.883 0.960 1.000
U 489§ 5 0.990 0.990 0.999
Joa 491 3 0.994 0.990 1.000
Hy 493 1 0.998 0.990 1.000
V 122 372 0.247 0.300 0.010
VS 139 355 0.281 0.300 0.0001
Jsa 82 412 0.166 0.200 0.0001
Jsb 492 2 0.996 0.990 1.000
k 494 0 1.000 1.000 0.998
Kpa 0 494 0.000 0.0001 0.020
Kpb 494 0 1.000 1.000 1.000
Lua 18 464 0.037 0.050 0.080
Lub 485 0 1.000 0.998 0.998
Dia 0 493 0.000 0.0001 0.0001
Dib 493 0 1.000 1.000 1.000
Coa 494 0 1.000 0.999 0.999
Cob 8 486 0.016 0.100 0.100
Doa 214 280 0.433 0.550 0.670
Dob 460 34 0.931 0.890 0.820
LWa 494 0 1.000 1.000 1.000
LWb 0 494 0.000 NA 0.010
Sc1 494 0 1.000 0.990 0.990
Sc2 0 494 0.000 NA 0.010
*

Number of patients with SCD (n = 494) who genotyped positive or negative for each RBC antigen. Antigen prevalence among this cohort was compared to reported prevalence for blacks and Caucasians determined by serological typing in Reid et al.16 with the exception of hrB (authors’ experience).

Antigens for which the frequency between Caucasians and patients with SCD had a p value of less than 0.0001.

Does not include four individuals predicted to be hrB– associated with DcE/DcE (R2R2).

§

Includes three U variants.

No results were determined for 12 Lua, nine Lub, one Dia, and one Dib due to low signal intensity on the HEA BeadChip.

NA = not available.