Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 16;78(Pt 2):195–213. doi: 10.1107/S2052520622001500

Table 3. SDPD of DFQ, structural models AD: (a) final results of the global optimization, (b) automatic Rietveld refinements, models with Z′ = 0.5 refined in subgroups with Z′ = 1 or in P1, (c) DFT-D geometry optimizations, energies given relative to the lowest energy of all calculations, and (d) user-controlled Rietveld refinements with molecular geometry restraints derived from DFT-D.

For more details see Tables S2, S3, S4 and S5 in the supporting information. GoF stands for goodness of fit.

  Model A B C D
  Space group P21/c P21/c Inline graphic P21/c
  Z 4 2 1 4
           
(a) FIDEL-GO global optimization (RE2)
  Rank 1 2 8 34
  Inline graphic 0.9891 0.9875 0.9840 0.9819
  R wp (%) 18.69 20.02 22.55 29.88
  V/Z3 mol−1) 358.87 358.92 369.82 356.38
           
(b) Automatic Rietveld refinement (AR) with TOPAS
  Rank 6 1 8 10
  R exp (%) 1.107 1.095 1.107 1.107
  R wp (%) 10.888 7.484 11.966 12.822
  R wp′ (%) 20.659 14.021 22.419 23.162
  GoF 9.832 6.833 10.808 11.580
  V/Z3 mol−1) 358.23 355.25 367.71 353.94
           
(c) DFT-D geometry optimization (DO) with CASTEP
  Rank 1 2 4 3
Cell fixed ΔE (kJ mol−1) 5.18 5.57 31.12 16.69
  V/Z3 mol−1) 358.87 358.92 369.82 357.73
Cell optimized ΔE (kJ mol−1) 0 0.54 24.56 13.89
  V/Z3 mol−1) 336.7 337.2 346.4 344.8
           
(d) User-controlled Rietveld refinement (UR) with TOPAS
  Rank 1 2 4 3
  R exp (%) 1.276 1.280 1.280 1.276
  R wp (%) 5.160 6.759 9.946 8.569
  R wp′ (%) 9.018 12.249 17.679 14.796
  GoF 4.045 5.279 7.770 6.718
  V/Z3 mol−1) 358.54 358.33 361.44 359.62
  a (Å) 13.696 14.217 3.885 14.335
  b (Å) 3.768 3.768 7.033 3.773
  c (Å) 28.789 13.704 14.101 27.374
  α (°) 90 90 102.71 90
  β (°) 105.16 102.50 86.08 103.69
  γ (°) 90 90 105.94 90