Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 16;78(Pt 2):195–213. doi: 10.1107/S2052520622001500

Table 9. CuCP: final results of the global optimization by FIDEL-GO (stage RE2).

For the best structure candidate the automatic Rietveld refinement (AR) and the final Rietveld refinement (UR) after transformation to P21/c (Z = 2) are shown, together with the published reference structure (CSD refcode PYRCUC02) after transformation from P21/n (Z = 2) to P21/c (Z = 2) for comparison. The Inline graphic values given for the Rietveld refinements refer to the comparison of the powder pattern simulated by TOPAS to the smoothed experimental pattern (AR) or the original experimental data (UR).

Rank   Space group Z Z Inline graphic V/Z3 mol−1) a (Å) b (Å) c (Å) β (°)
1   P21 1 2 0.9758 282.24 3.861 8.592 17.026 91.98
  Automated Rietveld (AR) P21 1 2 0.9968 281.55 3.862 8.580 17.006 91.98
  Final Rietveld (UR) P21/c 0.5 2 0.9926 281.52 3.862 8.580 17.307 100.91
  Reference structure P21/c 0.5 2   279.25 3.848 8.560 17.268 100.89
2   P21/c 0.5 2 0.9736 282.07 3.859 8.592 17.323 100.81
3   P21/c 0.5 2 0.9730 282.19 3.859 8.598 17.319 100.84
4   P21/c 1 4 0.9681 282.42 7.724 8.593 17.330 100.84
5   P21 1 2 0.9617 277.74 8.597 17.029 3.795 91.11
6   P21 1 2 0.9614 277.93 8.607 17.021 3.800 92.99
7   P21/c 1 4 0.9611 278.04 7.592 17.040 8.598 90.99