Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 12;23:298. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08487-8

Table 4.

Table showing the predictive ability for 5 traits in four datasets

Locations Traits ST-CV1 MT-CV1 MT-CV2 % Increase from ST-CV1 to MT-CV2
BLUEQ17 HI 0.27 0.29 0.32 18.5
GY 0.18 0.17 0.35 94.4
GN 0.21 0.20 0.50 138.1
SPI 0.11 0.11 0.18 63.6
FE 0.07 0.07 0.09 28.6
BLUEQ18 HI 0.39 0.40 0.41 5.1
GY 0.22 0.21 0.41 86.4
GN 0.23 0.22 0.42 82.6
SPI 0.22 0.22 0.26 18.2
FE 0.21 0.19 0.22 4.8
BLUEC18 HI 0.31 0.30 0.42 35.5
GY 0.21 0.23 0.50 138.1
GN 0.13 0.13 0.31 138.5
SPI 0.18 0.20 0.25 38.9
FE 0.13 0.14 0.15 15.4
BLUEAll HI 0.31 0.32 0.46 48.4
GY 0.20 0.21 0.39 95.0
GN 0.14 0.16 0.33 135.7
SPI 0.16 0.17 0.17 6.3
FE 0.17 0.17 0.19 11.8

Single-trait prediction model (ST-CV1), and multi-trait prediction mode (MT) with two schemes of cross-validation (MT-CV1 and MT-CV2); HI harvest index, GY grain yield in kg ha−1, GN grain number m−2, SPI spike partitioning index, FE fruiting efficiency in grains g− 1 of spike dry weight at anthesis+ 7 days, NDVI normalized difference vegetation index, CT canopy temperature in oC