Table 3.
Study | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Study score | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Representativeness of The exposed cohort | Selection of the non-Exposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Demonstration that the outcome of interest was not present at start of the study | Comparability of Cohorts on the basis of design or analysis | Assessment of outcome | Was follow- up Long enough For the outcome to occur? |
Adequacy of follow up of cohorts | ||
Yoo, et al., 2019 | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7/9 | |
Joshipura, et al. 2018 | * | * | * | * | * | * | 6/9 | ||
Oluwagbemigun, et al. 2015 | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7/9 | |
Liljestrand, et al. 2015 | * | * | * | * | * | * | 6/9 | ||
Greenblatt, et al. 2016 | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7/9 | |
Zhang, et al. 2021 | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8/9 |
aStudy score less than 4 indicates low quality, a score of 4 to 6 represents poor to moderate, and a score 7 or higher indicates as a good quality