Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 10;129(5):619–631. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac020

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Relationships between total area of xylem conduits per major and per minor veins (Xmajor and Xminor) and gs, gm, Kleaf and A. The data points are the means ± s.d. of 3–5 biological replicates for Xmajor, Xminor, A, gs and gm, and of 4–8 biological replicates for Kleaf. Both linear and non-linear models were fitted, and the model with the lowest residual sum of squares is shown. Model equations: (A) gs = 1.16(1 – e–0.0003Xmajor), (B) gm = 0.76(1 – e–0.0005Xmajor), (C) Kleaf = 2.83e0.0006Xmajor, (D) A = 43.7(1 – e–0.0004Xmajor), (E) gs = 0.0022Xminor + 0.47, (G) Kleaf = 5.3e0.0142Xminor and (H) A = 0.0745Xminor + 24.5. Xmajor, xylem area per major vein; Xminor, xylem area per minor area; gs, stomatal conductance; gm, mesophyll conductance; Kleaf, leaf hydraulic conductance; and A, leaf photosynthetic rate.