Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 6;2022:6574997. doi: 10.1155/2022/6574997

Table 6.

The percentage of microbial biofilm degradation.

Samples 2 × MBC/MFC concentrations of each Propolis CHX 0.2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S. mutans 27% 5 21 21 23 27.5 30.5 23 3.5 75%
S. salivarius 16.5 4.5 17 16.5 27.5 20 28 26.5 4.5 79
S. mitis 17 5 13.5 13.5 22.5 17 65.5 23 3.5 75.5
L. acidophilus 13.5 7.5 17 13.5 21 18.5 22.5 25 4.5 73
C. albicans 12 2.5 5.5 4.5 9.5 15 15 2.5 4 74
E. coli 13 7.5 16 14 22 16 23 24 4 73
S. aureus 16 5.5 13 14 22 16 60 21 4 74

∗Kermanshah (sample 1), Fasa (sample 2), Tabriz (sample 3), Neor Lake (sample 4), Sarab (sample 5), Gilan (sample 6), Khalkhal (sample 7), Kurdistan (sample 8), and Fereydun Shahr (sample 9). There were statistically difference between groups 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 (P-value < 0.05). There was a statistical difference between groups 1, 3, and 8 (P-value < 0.05). There were statistically difference between groups 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 with 1, 3, and 8 (P-value <Kermanshah (sample 1), Fasa (sample 2), Tabriz (sample 3), Neor Lake (sample 4), Sarab (sample 5), Gilan (sample 6), Khalkhal (sample 7), Kurdistan (sample 8), and Fereydun Shahr (sample 9). There were statistically difference between groups 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 (P-value < 0.05). There was a statistical difference between groups 1, 3, and 8 (P-value < 0.05). There were statistically difference between groups 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 with 1, 3, and 8 (P-value < 0.001). 0.001).