Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 2;30(4):1480–1490. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06644-2

Table 6.

Team and coach demographics, prevention expectancies, and utilisation fidelity stratified into low and high team compliance

Low compliance
teams N = 6 coaches
High compliance teams N = 42 coaches
Number of teams (female) 8 (1) 23 (7)
Training sessions per week, mean (SD, range) 2.1 (0.6, 1.8–3.4) 2.1 (0.8, 1.4–3.1)
Matches per week, mean (SD, range)a 1.0 (1.1, 0.4–3.2) 0.9 (0.9, 0.6–1.6)
Coach demographics
 Coach sex male/female, n 5/1 36/6
 Coaching experience years, median (IQR, range)b 7 (2, 5–7) 5 (4, 1–22)
Pre-season survey: prevention expectancies
 What is your opinion about the overall injury risk in floorball? median (IQR) (1 extremely low–7 extremely high) 5 (2) 4 (2)
 In general, how preventable do you think floorball injuries are? median (IQR) (1 extremely not preventable–7 extremely preventable) 6 (1) 6 (1)
 My knowledge about preventing injuries in floorball is… median (IQR) (1 extremely poor–7 extremely good) 4 (2) 4 (2)
 In your opinion, what would happen to a floorball player’s overall risk of injury if he/she participated in injury prevention training? median (IQR) (1 increase extremely–7 decrease extremely) 4.5 (4) 5.5 (4)
 What do you think would happen to a floorball player’s performance if he/she did injury prevention training regularly? median (IQR) (1 decrease extremely–7 increase extremely) 3 (3) 5.5 (1)
Post-season survey: Knee Control utilisation fidelityc
 Knee Control dose, sessions per week mean (SD, range) 1.1 (0.8, 0.2–1.6) 2.0 (0.8, 1.2–3.0)
 Knee Control use, min/training session mean (SD, range) 14 (8, 5–25) 17 (5, 10–25)
 Knee Control number of sets, median (IQR)d 2 (0) 2 (2)
 Knee Control use, min/week 15 34
 Timing of Knee Control used
  Before training session, % 0 25
  Beginning of training session, % 100 75
  During training session, % 0 0
  After training session, % 0 0
 Use of all six Knee Control exercises
  Mostly/always, % 50 91
  Never/rarely, % 50 9
 Knee Control progression level, median (IQR, range)e,f 1 (1, 1–3) 2 (1, 1–4)

Low compliance < 80%, high compliance 80–100%

aMissing for one team in high compliance group

bMissing for one coach in low compliance group and one coach in high compliance group

cOnly one response per team included. Missing data for one team in the low compliance group

dMissing for one team in the high compliance group

eMissing for two coaches in high compliance group

fProgression levels A (easiest) to D (most advanced) numbered from 1 to 4