Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 13;5(4):e227234. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7234

Table 2. Cascade Event Rates Among Screening Breast MRI vs Mammography Recipients in the 6 Months Following the Screening Test.

Characteristics Event rate per 100 members Breast MRI cascade-attributable event rate per 100 members (95% CI)
Breast MRI (n = 9208) Mammography (n = 9208)
Mammary
All mammary cascade events 134.1 95.1 39.0 (33.7 to 44.2)
Imaging tests 18.1 13.1 5.0 (3.8 to 6.2)
Procedures 22.4 5.1 17.3 (15.5 to 19.0)
Visits 89.3 76.0 13.3 (9.4 to 17.2)
Hospitalizations 0.38 0.04 0.34 (0.18 to 0.50)
New diagnoses 3.9 0.9 3.0 (2.5 to 3.6)
Extramammary
All extramammary cascade events 304.5 284.8 19.6 (8.6 to 30.7)
Laboratory tests 114.9 111.8 3.2 (−2.2 to 8.5)
Imaging tests 33.3 33.7 −0.45 (−2.7 to 1.8)
Procedures 10.3 9.4 0.97 (−0.08 to 2.0)
Visits 141.0 125.2 15.8 (10.2 to 21.4)
Hospitalizations 0.27 0.38 −0.11 (−0.28 to 0.06)
New diagnoses 4.7 4.4 0.29 (−0.53 to 1.11)
Othera
Pathology/cytology 35.8 21.7 14.1 (12.3 to 15.9)

Abbreviation: MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

a

Since billing codes for the laboratory tests likely to follow mammary findings (ie, pathology and cytology) do not have sufficient specificity to identify breast vs other tissue sites for biopsy or cytology samples, we grouped these events as a separate category and did not include them in counts of aggregate cascade event or spending estimates.