Table 7.
Direct comparisons of human HDP activity against viruses.
| Virus | Direct comparison of HDP activity |
|---|---|
| HSV-1 | HNP1, HNP2, and HNP3 were about equal in effectiveness |
| HSV-2 | HNP1 and HD5 were most effective among defensins tested. HBD3 was more effective than HBD1 |
| VZV | HBD2 and LL-37 had similar activities, but unlike with HBD2, LL-37 pre-incubation of virus and peptide before infection increased antiviral activity compared to after infection |
| Vaccinia | HBD2, but not HBD1 or HNP1/2 had effect. This effect was more potent than LL-37 |
| HAdV | For HNP1 and HD5, viral species A, B1, B2, C, and E susceptible, but D and F are not. HD5 was more effective than HNP1 against HAdV5 and HAdV35. HBD1/2 and HD6 mostly ineffective. Defensins and LL-37 inhibit different species. |
| HPV | HD5 had highest efficacy. HBD1/2 and HD6 had no effect. HNP1-4 and LL-37 had similar efficacies |
| BKV | HD5 had highest efficacy. HNP1 and HBD2 had similar effect, while HBD1 had no effect |
| JCV | HD5 had highest efficacy. Discrepancy for activity of HNP1 and HBD1/2. No effect seen in HNP3 or HBD4 |
| SV40 | HD5 inhibited, while HNP1 and HBD1/2 did not |
| HCV | Mixture of HNP1-4 (about as effective as LL-37) was more effective than mixture of HBD1-5+116 |
| Influenza A virus | HNP3, HBD1, and HBD2 did not increase IAV uptake by neutrophils, unlike HNP1/2 and HD5. HNP1/2 (with slight edge to HNP2) more effective than HBDs or LL-37. HNP1/2 work synergistically with LL-37 |
| RSV | HBD2 had most activity while HBD1 was ineffective. LL-37 was less effective than HBD2 |
| HIV-I | LL-37 and HNP4 are more effective than HNP1-3, most likely due to HNP4 less binding to serum. Combination of HBD2 and HBD3 was more effective than either HBD alone. Conflicting data about HBD1 activity, with HBD2/3 having more activity. HBD2 inhibits single stage infection and provides long term antiviral activity, unlike HBD1. |
Comparisons are only between HDPs tested in the same experiment.