Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 16;18(4):2687–2702. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01288

Table 1. Summary of TIES Resultsa.

system ligand pairs exp. range RMSE MUE rp
BACE 58 –1.79 to 1.88 1.17(0.12) 0.91(0.10) 0.49(0.09)
BACE (Hunt) 60 –3.82 to 3.70 1.33(0.10) 1.10(0.10) 0.68(0.06)
BACE (P2) 26 –0.90 to 0.70 1.09(0.11) 0.92(0.11) 0.51(0.18)
BACE (scaffold) 21 –4.20 to 2.60 1.05(0.13) 0.87(0.13) 0.88(0.04)
CDK2 25 –2.07 to 2.81 1.15(0.13) 0.96(0.13) 0.43(0.15)
CMET 25 –4.94 to 2.35 1.80(0.30) 1.38(0.23) 0.84(0.04)
Galectine-3 7 –2.68 to 0.96 0.75(0.23) 0.58(0.18) 0.76(0.31)
JNK1 31 –1.27 to 0.92 1.23(0.17) 0.98(0.13) 0.45(0.17)
MCL1 71 –2.84 to 1.94 1.80(0.18) 1.41(0.13) 0.40(0.11)
P38 56 –2.86 to 2.18 1.26(0.12) 0.98(0.11) 0.59(0.08)
PDE2 34 –2.06 to 2.31 1.43(0.25) 0.95(0.18) 0.54(0.17)
PTP1B 49 –4.72 to 3.67 1.35(0.17) 0.99(0.13) 0.56(0.14)
thrombin 16 –0.66 to 0.98 1.07(0.15) 0.88(0.15) 0.24(0.23)
TYK2 24 –2.36 to 2.49 1.08(0.16) 0.88(0.13) 0.60(0.13)
           
All 503 –4.94 to 3.70 1.36(0.05) 1.04(0.04) 0.58(0.03)
a

The number of alchemical transformations studied and corresponding values of several statistical parameters–root mean square error (RMSE) and mean unsigned error (MUE) for all TIES predictions as well as Pearson’s r (rp) between ΔΔGTIES and experimental results–are reported. Standard errors are included in parentheses. Exp. range denotes the range of experimental ΔΔGs. The unit is in kcal/mol.