TABLE 4.
Tool questions Newcastle-Ottawa.
References | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
Cohort studies | ||||||||
Chatzi et al. (21) | * | * | - | * | ** | * | * | * |
Saunders et al. (36) | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * |
Steenweg de Graaff et al. (33) | * | * | - | * | ** | - | * | * |
Tobias et al. (37) | * | * | - | * | ** | - | * | * |
Parisi et al. (34) | * | * | - | - | ** | * | * | * |
Case-control studies | ||||||||
Olmedo-Requena et al. (28) | - | * | * | * | ** | - | * | * |
Martínez-Galiano et al. (30) | - | * | * | * | ** | - | * | - |
Cánovas-Conesa et al. (32) | - | * | * | * | ** | - | * | * |
Items of Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies: 1. representativeness; 2. non-exposed cohort; 3. ascertainment of exposure; 4. outcome; 5. comparability of cohorts; 6. assessment of outcome; 7. follow-up; 8. adequacy of follow-up. A maximum of one star is allocated for each domain within the “Selection” and “Outcome” categories; and a maximum of two stars is allocated for “Comparability”.