Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 14;2022(4):CD013696. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013696.pub2

Comparison 2. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
2.1 ACT vs matched‐intensity smoking cessation treatment 5   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1.1 Face‐to‐face 2 550 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.76 [0.32, 1.78]
2.1.2 Telephone 1 121 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.35 [0.74, 2.46]
2.1.3 Website 1 2637 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.79, 1.05]
2.1.4 Smartphone app 1 2415 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.77 [1.32, 2.37]
2.2 ACT vs NRT 1 102 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.27 [0.53, 3.02]
2.3 ACT vs brief advice 1 144 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.27 [0.59, 2.75]
2.4 ACT vs less intensive ACT 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.50, 2.01]
2.5 Mental health outcomes 2   Other data No numeric data