Table 1:
Proline analog |
Proline structure | CAS | ProRS variant |
Reported [NaCl] (M) |
Reported level of proline replacement |
Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4R-OH | 51-35-4 | wt | 0.3 | 88% | Lieblich, et al., 2017 | |
4S-OH | 618-27-9 | wt | 0.3 | 91% | Lieblich, et al., 2017 | |
4R-F | 2507-61- 1 |
wt | 0.3 | 96% | Lieblich, 2017 | |
4S-F | 2438-57- 5 |
wt | 0.3 | 97% | Lieblich, 2017 | |
4,4-diF | 52683- 81-5 |
wt | 0.3 | 86% | Lieblich, 2017 | |
3S-F | * | 261350- 70-3 |
– | – | “virtually complete” |
Kim, Hardcastle, & Conticello, 2006 |
3R-F | 261350- 69-0 |
– | – | “virtually complete” |
Kim, Hardcastle, & Conticello, 2006 | |
Dhp | 4043-88- 3 |
wt | 0.3 | ≤100% | Fang, Lieblich, & Tirrell, 2019 | |
Thz | 34592- 47-7 |
wt | 0.3 | 90% | Fang, Lieblich, & Tirrell, 2019 | |
Aze | 2133-34- 8 |
wt | 0.3 | ≥100% | Fang, Lieblich, & Tirrell, 2019 | |
Pip | 3105-95- 1 |
C443G | 0.3 | 89% | Fang, Lieblich, & Tirrell, 2019 |