Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 31;13:737968. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.737968

Table 2.

Changes of biomarkers after one-month treatment in NAEB and EA Group.

NAEB (n=9) EA (n=10)
Baseline Follow-up p-value Baseline Follow-up p-value
FeNO, ppb 59(53) 25(11)* 0.020 46.5(57.3) 28.5(51.7) 0.416
LCQ 16.2 ± 2.4 20.4 ± 3.5* 0.049 NA NA NA
VAS 50(30) 10(5)# <0.001 NA NA NA
ACT NA NA NA 19.4 ± 3.7 23.3 ± 1.7* 0.014
Sputum Eos, % 5.0(37.8) 3.8(10.3) 0.148 16.4(36) 5(41.6) 0.734
Sputum Eos (109/L) 0.20(0.80) 0.18(0.40) 0.461 0.41(1.70) 0.10(0.70) 0.160
Blood Eos (109/L) 0.3(0.2) 0.2(0.1)* 0.050 0.4(0.2) 0.3(0.2) 0.456
Blood HPC (cells/ml) 939(822) 843(1,726) 0.820 1553(1,697) 775(1,160)* 0.014
Blood EoP (cells/ml) 68(229) 76(143) 0.637 145(328) 84 (90)* 0.020
NAEB (n=7) EA (n=6)
Sputum HPC (cells/ml) 1345(11476) 887(1370) 0.297 742(2051) 432(1574) 0.900
Sputum EoP (cells/ml) 169(275) 7(200) 0.297 69(294) 31(41) 0.438

FeNO, LCQ, VAS, and ACT were presented as mean ± SD and analyzed by pair t-test. Other variables were presented as median (IQR) calculated by Wilcoxon matched-pairs sign rank test. Absolute cell numbers enumerated by means of flow cytometry are presented as cells per milliliter. Compared with baseline: *p < 0.05, #p < 0.01