Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 14;10(4):E558–E561. doi: 10.1055/a-1747-3242

Table 2. Clinical outcomes in the subgroup analysis based on patients with ERCP and glucagon (Group 1) to ERCP without glucagon (Group 2) after propensity matching.

Before matching After matching
Primary outcome ERCP w glucagon (Group A) N = 9008 ERCP w/o glucagon (Group B) N = 256578 RR (95 % CI) ERCP w glucagon (Group A) N = 9008 ERCP wo glucagon (Group B) N = 9008 RR (95 % CI)
GIB 100 (1.11) 3420 (1.33) 0.83 (0.68 – 1.01) 100 (1.11) 149 (1.65) 0.67 (0.52 – 0.86)
PEP 638 (7.08) 27725 (10.81) 0.66 (0.61 – 0.71) 638 (7.08) 995 (11.05) 0.64 (0.58 – 0.71)
GI Perforation 16 (0.18) 627 (0.24) 0.73 (0.44 – 1.19) 16 (0.18) 25 (0.28) 0.64 (0.34 – 1.20)
Hyperglycemia 30 (0.33) 1,415 (0.55) 0.60 (0.42–0.87) 30 (0.33) 46 (0.51) 0.65 (0.41–1.03)
Hyperkalemia 95 (1.55) 2017 (0.79) 1.34 (1.09–1.64) 95 (1.06) 114 (1.27) 0.83 (0.64–1.09)
Hospitalization 1243 (13.80) 104237 (40.63) 0.34 (0.32 – 0.36) 1243 (13.80) 3676 (40.81) 0.34 (0.32 – 0.36)
Death 163 (1.81) 4904 (1.91) 0.95 (0.81 – 1.11) 163 (1.81) 202 (2.24) 0.81 (0.66 – 0.99)

ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio; GIB, gastrointestinal bleeding; PEP, post-ERCP pancreatitis.