Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 1;9:798314. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.798314

Table 3.

Comparison of rates of myopic progression among four kinds of OK lenses over a 1.5-year period of use.

No progression Slow progression Fast progression
ER: ≤ 0.00 D ER: 0.00–1.00 D ER ≥ 1.00 D
AL: ≤ 0.15 mm AL: 0.15–0.4 mm AL > 0.4 mm
Refraction growth
 CRT 26.7% 36.0%*, 37.3%*,,
 Euclid 22.1% 56.6%* 21.3%*
 Alpha 26.3% 53.5% 20.2%
 Hiline 32.2% 37.0% 30.8%
Axial length elongation
 CRT 14.8%*,, 33.1% 52.1%*,,
 Euclid 29.5%* 40.0% 30.5%*
 Alpha 27.1% 36.0% 36.9%
 Hiline 25.4% 37.5% 37.1%

Corrected pairwise comparison of P-values are represented by

*

, significant (P < 0.05) difference between CRT and Euclid.

Significant difference between CRT and Alpha.

Significant difference between CRT and Hiline. Pairwise comparison is corrected for multiple comparisons. ER, estimated refraction. No progression means reduction (or no change) in refraction or less than (equal to) 0.15 mm AL elongation. Slow progression means 0 to 1 D refraction growth or 0.15 to 0.4 mm AL elongation. Fast progression means more than 1 D refraction growth or more than 0.4 mm AL elongation.