Table 2.
Transcription factor families that were greatly respond to continuous cropping.
| TF families | SP_S2 vs. FP_S2 | SP_S3 vs. FP_S3 | SP_S4 vs. FP_S4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up | Down | Up | Down | Up | Down | |
| AP2/ERF-ERF | 20 | 11 | 7 | 5 | 63 | 37 |
| MYB | 18 | 13 | 11 | 6 | 23 | 31 |
| bHLH | 11 | 16 | 10 | 4 | 31 | 18 |
| bZIP | 3 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 16 | 38 |
| WRKY | 18 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 17 | 36 |
| MYB-related | 7 | 21 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 19 |
| NAC | 11 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 35 |
| Trihelix | 12 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 28 |
| GRAS | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 15 |
| HSF | 4 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 18 |
| C3H | 8 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 12 |
| GARP-G2-like | 5 | 7 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 14 |
| C2H2 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 18 | 10 |
| HB-HD-ZIP | 2 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 15 |
| B3 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 14 |
| B3-ARF | 2 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 17 | 2 |
| LOB | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| C2C2-Dof | 0 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 10 |
| SBP | 3 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 11 |
| FAR1 | 3 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Tify | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| C2C2-GATA | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 |
| TCP | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 8 |
| MADS-MIKC | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
| HB-other | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
| AP2/ERF-AP2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 4 |
| TUB | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| C2C2-CO-like | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| AP2/ERF-RAV | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| BES1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Others | 20 | 21 | 14 | 16 | 37 | 38 |
| Total | 196 | 221 | 129 | 118 | 391 | 470 |