Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 19;3(4):100309. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100309

Table 1.

Study Characteristics

Study Country Study Design Treatment Period No.of Patient Male, % Mean Age (y) Initial ICI
Regimen(i) Therapy Line TPS ≥ 50% (%)a PFSi (M) Best Response
G3/4 IrAE Cessation Reason
CR PR Stable Disease PD NR
Bernard et al., 201813 France Retrospective 2012.5–2017.10 1 NR NR Anti–PD-(L)1 NR NR 19.9 0 1 0 0 0 0 PD
Fujita et al., 201814 Japan Retrospective 2015.12–2018.3 12 66.7 70.8 Nivo Second∼ 41.7 6.2 0 7 2 3 0 2 PD
Niki et al., 201815 Japan Retrospective 2015.12–2017.12 11 81.8 66 Nivo NR NR 4.9 0 5 2 4 0 0 PD
Santini et al., 201816 America Retrospective 2011.4–2016.5 38 52.6 64 Anti–PD(L)1/anti-CTLA4 First∼ NR NR 18 20 0 6 irAE
Fujita et al., 201917 Japan Retrospective 2018.1–2018.12 18 61.1 71 Nivo/Pemb Second 50 NR 0 8 4 5 1 0 NR
Watanabe et al., 201918 Japan Retrospective 2015.12–2017.12 14 57.1 61.5 Atezo/nivo/pemb NR 50 3.7 0 3 5 6 0 0 PD
Mouri et al., 201919 Japan Retrospective 2015.12–2018.8 21 90.5 69.6 Nivo Second∼ NR 13.3 1 12 8 0 0 7 irAE
Fujita et al., 202020 Japan Retrospective 2018.1–2019.8 15 93.3 71.4 Atezo/durva Second∼ 0 3 0 0 5 9 1 0 PD
Gobbini et al., 202021 France Retrospective 2010–2018 144 67.4 63 Anti–PD-(L)1 First∼ 14.6 13 10 61 38 26 9 27 irAE, PD, clinical decision
Herbst et al., 202022 Keynote 10 Retrospective 2013.8–2015.2 14 NR NR Pemb First∼ NR NR 0 13 0 0 1 NR Clinical decision
Katayama et al., 202023 Japan Retrospective 2017.4–2018.11 35 68.6 70 Nivo/pemb/atezo Third 40 4 0 12 12 10 1 NR PD
Kitagawa et al., 202024 Japan Retrospective 2018.4–2019.9 17 64.7 69 Anti–PD-(L)1 First∼ 17.6 9.7 0 6 9 2 0 3 PD
Furuya et al., 202125 Japan Retrospective 2018.4–2019.2 38 NR NR Nivo/pemb Second∼ NR NR 0 8 16 11 3 NR irAE, PD
Takahara et al., 202226 Japan Retrospective 2016.8–2021.7 24 66.7 NR Durva/pemb/nivo NR 45.8 NR NR 4 irAE, PD
Xu et al., 202227 People's Republic of China Retrospective 2018.12–2021.6 40 77.5 NR Anti–PD-1 NR NR 5.7 0 14 19 7 0 NR PD
Study Interval Time (Median mo) ICI Rechallenge
Regimen(r) Therapy Line TPS ≥ 50% (%)a PFSr (M) Best Response
G3/4 irAE
CR PR Stable Disease PD NR
Bernard et al., 201813 10 Anti–PD-(L)1 NR NR 35.4 0 0 1 0 0 0
Fujita et al., 201814 NR Pemb NR 50 3.1 0 1 4 6 1 0
Niki et al., 201815 4.2 Nivo/pemb NR NR 2.7 0 3 2 6 0 0
Santini et al., 201816 NR Anti–PD-(L)1/anti–CTLA4 NR NR NR NR 8
Fujita et al., 201917 NR Atezo Third∼ NR NR 0 0 7 11 0 2
Watanabe et al., 201918 6.5 Atezo/nivo/pemb NR NR 1.6 0 1 2 11 0 0
Mouri et al., 201919 NR Nivo NR NR 7.4 0 4 14 2 1 2
Fujita et al., 202020 NR Nivo/pemb NR NR 2.4 0 0 4 9 2 2
Gobbini et al., 202021 NR Anti–PD-(L)1 Second∼ NR 4.4 5 18 45 54 22 4
Herbst et al., 202022 NR Pemb NR NR NR 0 6 5 2 1 NR
Katayama et al., 202023 5.2 Nivo/pemb/atezo Fourth NR 2.7 0 1 14 18 2 NR
Kitagawa et al., 202024 NR Anti–PD-(L)1 Second∼ NR 4 0 1 9 7 0 2
Furuya et al., 202125 NR Atezo NR NR NR 0 1 12 20 5 NR
Takahara et al., 202226 NR Nivo/atezo/pemb NR NR NR 0 2 9 13 0 3
Xu et al., 202227 NR Anti–PD-1 NR NR 6.8 0 9 25 6 0 NR

Anti–PD-(L)1, immune checkpoint blockade targeting programmed cell death-(ligand)1; Atezo, atezolizumab; CR, complete response; Durva, durvalumab; G3/4 irAE, grade 3/4 immune-related adverse event; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; Nivo, nivolumab; NR, not reported; PD, progressive disease; Pemb, pembrolizumab; PFSi, progression-free survival of initial ICI; PFSr, progression-free survival of ICI rechallenge; PR, partial response; Regimen(i), initial ICI regimen; Regimen(r), ICI rechallenge regimen; TPS, tumor proportion score.

a

Percentage of patients whose TPS is equals to or more than 50%.