Table 2. MINORS score in non-randomized studies included in the review.
He et al. 2021 | Potretzke et al. 2016 | Mariappan et al. 2006 | |
---|---|---|---|
A clearly stated aim | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Inclusion of consecutive samples | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Prospective collection of data | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Unbiased assessment of the study endpoint | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Follow-up period appropriate to the aim of the study | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Loss to follow-up less than 5% | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Prospective calculation of the study size | 0 | 0 | 0 |
An adequate control group | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Contemporary groups | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Baseline equivalence of groups | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Adequate statistical analyses | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Total | 18 | 18 | 20 |
MINORS, methodological index for non-randomized studies. The items are scored as 0 (not reported), 1 (reported but inadequate), or 2 (reported and adequate). The global ideal score is 16 for non-comparative studies and 24 for comparative studies.