Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 16;54(4):472–478. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2022.01.006

Table 4.

Overall performance of rounds 2 and 3 participants using top five commercial kits or platforms in SARS-CoV-2 proficiency testing program

Round Assay Concordant (%)
Discordant (%)
S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10
2 (May 2020) Cepheid GeneXpert Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 97.8 100 91.5 97.8 100 2.2 8.5 2.2
Seegene Allplex 2019-nCoV 100 100 69.2 92.9 100 30.8 7.1
AusDiagnostics SARS-CoV-2, Influenza and RSV (8-Well) 100 100 100 100 100
Roche Diagnostics Cobas SARS-CoV-2 100 100 81.8 100 100 18.2
Hologic Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2 assay 100 100 NA 100 100 NA
3 (Nov 2020) S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15
Cepheid GeneXpert Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 100 100 100 94.0 94.0 6.0 6.0
Seegene Allplex 2019-nCoV 100 100 100 100 100
Roche Diagnostics Cobas SARS-CoV-2 100 100 100 100 100
AusDiagnostics SARS-CoV-2, Influenza and RSV (8-Well) 100 100 100 100 100
Seegene Allplex SARS-CoV-2 assay 100 100 100 100 100

NA, results not assessed; S6, SARS-CoV-2 positive; S7, SARS-CoV-2 positive; S8, SARS-CoV-2 presumptive positive (inconclusive); S9, SARS-CoV-2 negative; S10, SARS-CoV-2 positive; S11, SARS-CoV-2 negative; S12, SARS-CoV-2 negative; S13, SARS-CoV-2 negative; S14, SARS-CoV-2 positive; S15, SARS-CoV-2 positive.