Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 15;19(4):2482. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.4.2482

Table 1.

When assessments are undertaken and by whom (n=17)

During EL, n(%)* On return to the university, n(%)* Total, n (%)
Facilitators/tutors/preceptors 10 (58.8) 3 (17.6) 13 (16.4)
Director of experiential learning¥ 0 (0.0) 5 (29.4) 5 (6.3)
Academic staff directly involved in EL#, ¥ 1 (54.9) 13 (76.5) 14 (17.7)
Academic staff not directly involved in EL#, ¥ 0 (0.0) 8 (47.1) 8 (10.1)
Patients 2 (11.8) 2 (11.8) 4 (5.1)
Students (self-assessment) 6 (35.3) 4 (23.5) 10 (12.7)
Students (peer-review/assessment) 2 (11.8) 3 (17.6) 5 (6.3)
University-employed clinical facilitators (including teacher practitioners, university regional tutors)¥ 10 (58.8) 10 (58.8) 20 (25.3)
Total, n(%) 31 (39.2) 48 (60.8) 79 (100)
*

Respondents were allowed to select more than one option; therefore, totals might exceed 100%.

#

Academic staff refer to faculty of the School of Pharmacy

¥

University staff