Table 2.

Hierarchical regression for predicting intention to stop bullying

	Model 1				Model 2a				Model 2b
Variable	b	95 % CI	SE	p	b	95 % CI	SE	p	b	95 % CI	SE	p
Teacher (male)	−0.18	[−0.35, −0.02]	0.08	0.032	−0.15	[−0.34, 0.04]	0.10	0.126	−0.14	[−0.32, 0.05]	0.10	0.151
Boy	−0.30	[−0.50, −0.11]	0.10	0.003	−0.05	[−0.29, 0.19]	0.12	0.683	−0.05	[−0.28, 0.19]	0.12	0.701
Bullying	−0.90	[−1.12, −0.67]	0.11	0.000	−0.81	[−1.03, −0.58]	0.11	0.000	−0.84	[−1.07, −0.60]	0.12	0.000
Victimization	0.10	[−0.01, 0.21]	0.05	0.063	0.06	[−0.05, 0.17]	0.06	0.305	0.08	[−0.03, 0.18]	0.05	0.149
Condemning	−0.25	[−0.47, −0.03]	0.11	0.026	−0.23	[−0.48, 0.02]	0.13	0.075	−0.23	[−0.47, 0.02]	0.12	0.066
Empathy-raising	−0.13	[−0.33, 0.07]	0.10	0.205	−0.11	[−0.34, 0.11]	0.11	0.321	−0.12	[−0.33, 0.09]	0.11	0.260
Affective empathy					0.16	[0.03, 0.30]	0.07	0.019	0.09	[−0.09, 0.27]	0.09	0.323
Cognitive empathy					0.30	[0.14, 0.47]	0.09	0.000	0.14	[−0.14, 0.42]	0.14	0.334
Condemning x Affective empathy									0.04	[−0.26, 0.33]	0.15	0.817
Empathy-raising x Affective empathy									0.19	[−0.05, 0.43]	0.12	0.121
Condemning x Cognitive empathy									0.41	[0.11, 0.72]	0.16	0.009
Empathy-raising x Cognitive empathy									0.04	[−0.29, 0.38]	0.17	0.801
R2	0.212		0.06	0.000	0.286		0.05	0.000	0.307		0.06	0.000

Note: N = 277. Reference categories are female, girl and the combined message