Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 18;35(4):1517–1550. doi: 10.1007/s00148-022-00891-4

Table 6.

Determinants of the extent of the recovery in local mobility after re-opening, June 3: baseline

wrt Jan 13-Feb 16 wrt Mar 30
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Mobility changes, March 30 − 0.809⋆⋆⋆ − 0.757⋆⋆⋆
(0.054) (0.064)
Disease exposure − 0.607⋆⋆⋆ − 0.471⋆⋆⋆ − 0.650⋆⋆⋆ − 0.486⋆⋆⋆
(0.176) (0.176) (0.171) (0.168)
Remote work feasibility − 0.972⋆⋆⋆ − 1.082⋆⋆⋆ − 0.836⋆⋆⋆ − 0.953⋆⋆⋆
(0.242) (0.240) (0.239) (0.234)
Physical proximity − 0.251 − 0.303 − 0.173 − 0.198
(0.189) (0.186) (0.189) (0.189)
Fixed-term contracts expired, % − 0.714⋆⋆⋆ − 0.673⋆⋆⋆ − 0.648⋆⋆⋆ − 0.599⋆⋆⋆
(0.058) (0.062) (0.055) (0.059)
Participation rate, % − 0.649⋆⋆⋆ − 0.448⋆⋆ − 0.659⋆⋆⋆ − 0.364
(0.110) (0.211) (0.108) (0.215)
Region fixed effects No Yes No Yes
Observations 462 462 462 462
R-squared 0.423 0.495 0.451 0.525
F-stat 52.26 17.37 66.72 20.27

Notes: The dependent variable is the variation in mobility on June 3 relative to January 13-February 16 (columns 1 and 2) or March 30 (columns 3 and 4) at the level of LLMA. p < 0.1; ⋆⋆ p < 0.05; ⋆⋆⋆ p < 0.01