Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 18;35(4):1517–1550. doi: 10.1007/s00148-022-00891-4

Table 7.

Determinants of the extent of the recovery in local mobility after re-opening, June 3: robustness checks

Baseline Demo controls Geo controls
(1) (2) (3)
Mobility changes, March 30 − 0.757⋆⋆⋆ − 0.794⋆⋆⋆ − 0.816⋆⋆⋆
(0.064) (0.077) (0.084)
Disease exposure − 0.486⋆⋆⋆ − 0.381⋆⋆ − 0.400⋆⋆
(0.168) (0.170) (0.172)
Remote work feasibility − 0.953⋆⋆⋆ − 0.708⋆⋆⋆ − 0.608⋆⋆
(0.234) (0.261) (0.269)
Physical proximity − 0.198 − 0.182 − 0.134
(0.189) (0.198) (0.194)
Fixed-term contracts expired, % − 0.599⋆⋆⋆ − 0.646⋆⋆⋆ − 0.665⋆⋆⋆
(0.059) (0.057) (0.062)
Participation rate, % − 0.364 − 0.686⋆⋆ − 0.780⋆⋆⋆
(0.215) (0.279) (0.280)
Population 2019, log − 1.668⋆⋆⋆ − 3.085⋆⋆⋆
(0.585) (0.928)
Residents < 19 years, % − 1.255 − 1.203
(0.663) (0.648)
Residents > 65 years, % − 1.442⋆⋆⋆ − 1.686⋆⋆⋆
(0.488) (0.486)
Excess mortality rate − 2.567 − 1.899
(2.825) (2.824)
Surface squared km, log 2.651⋆⋆
(1.026)
Altitude metres, log 0.131
(0.612)
Tourism index 0.724
(0.671)
Observations 462 462 462
R-squared 0.525 0.543 0.555
F-stat 20.27 19.22 17.90

Notes: The dependent variable is the variation in mobility on June 3 relative to March 30 at the level of LLMA. All specifications include region fixed effects. p < 0.1; ⋆⋆ p < 0.05; ⋆⋆⋆ p < 0.01