Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 4;9:831096. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.831096

Table 1.

Published studies of circulating bacterial DNA in cancer.

Cancer type Methodology Main findings Study
Breast Metagenomics analysis of plasma DNA cbDNA identified as a potential prognostic indicator Huang et al. (16)
Gastric 16S rRNA sequencing of serum samples Lower alpha diversity in cancer patients compared to controls; specific taxa correlate with clinical indices Dong et al. (17)
Hepatocellular 16S rRNA sequencing of serum samples Lower alpha diversity in cancer patients compared to controls; Differentially abundant taxa between cancer and controls; Development of 5-microbial gene marker panel Cho et al. (18)
Ovarian Metagenomic analysis of bacterial DNA derived from extra-cellular vesicles from serum samples Different metagenomic profiles between cancer and controls. Acinetobacter common to cancer samples Kim et al. (19)
Colorectal Metagenomics analysis of plasma DNA Slightly lower diversity in cancer samples; cbDNA mainly from gut-associated species; 28-species model could distinguish cancer from controls. Xiao et al. (21)
PCR amplification of specific microbial targets (16S gene, E. coli, B. fragilis, C. albicans) from whole blood samples Higher detection of all fragments, except E. coli, in cancer samples; detection of microbial fragments associated with metastasis Messaritakis et al. (22)
PCR amplification of specific microbial targets (16S gene, E. coli, B. fragilis, C. albicans) from whole blood samples Association between detection of microbial fragments and circulating tumor cells Koulouridi et al. (23)
Multiple cancer types Whole genome sequencing of whole blood samples; metagenomic analysis of plasma samples Circulating microbial DNA profiles can distinguish between multiple types of cancer, including low-grade tumors; similar discrimination seen in plasma analysis Poore et al. (24)