Skip to main content
. 2022 May;12(5):2620–2633. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-459

Table 2. Scanner models and parameters resulting in heterogeneous MR image data.

Model Field strength (Tesla) Coil FOV (mm) Matrix size Slice thickness (mm) Repetition time (ms) Echo time (ms) Flip angle Number of slices Number of scans
Siemens Aera 1.5 Siemens Tx/Rx 15-Channel Knee Coil 140×140 384×384 3 2,790 15 150 27 2
Siemens Avanto 1.5 Siemens CP Extremity 140×140 320×320 3 2,660, 3,190 14, 15 180 25, 30 2
Siemens Espree 1.5 Body 140×140 384×384 3 2,700 11 180 30 1
Siemens Symphony 1.5 Siemens CP Extremity 140×140, 150×150, 160×160 256×256, 320×320 3
4
2,920, 3,000, 3,140, 3,260, 3,400, 3,500, 3,790, 3,920 14, 15, 17 180, 150 23, 24, 27, 28, 30, 31 10
Siemens Trio 3 Siemens 8-Channel Knee Coil 140×140 448×448 2.5 5,970 10 150 40 2
Siemens Verio 3 Siemens 8-Channel Knee Coil 134×140, 154×160 308×320 2.5 3,250, 3,550, 3,620 16 150 35, 38 8
Philips Achieva 1.5 Philips SENSE-Knee-8; SENSE-Flex-M 140×140, 150×150, 186×186 480×480, 528×528, 560×560, 704×704 3 3,312, 3,581, 3,583, 3,589, 3,988 15, 30 90 25, 27, 30 5