Skip to main content
. 2000 Oct;44(10):2764–2770. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.10.2764-2770.2000

TABLE 3.

Comparison of predictions of activity by molecular topology and LDA analysis versus experimental MICs

Quinolone LDA analysis result
Experimental MIC (μg/ml)
M value Predicted activity
Moxifloxacin 3.90 Active 0.2
Sparfloxacin 5.06 Active 0.4
Gatifloxacin 4.54 Active 0.9
Temafloxacin −0.21 N.C.a 1.0
Levofloxacin 0.77 N.C. 2.1
Ofloxacin 0.77 N.C. 2.5
Trovafloxacin 1.69 Active 2.7
Ciprofloxacin 7.20 Active 2.8
Lomefloxacin −1.28 Inactive 4.5
Clinafloxacin 2.16 Active 5.0
Grepafloxacin 3.85 Active 5.4
Fleroxacin −0.18 N.C. 8.1
Pefloxacin 1.13 N.C. 10.0
Norfloxacin −0.95 N.C. 11.4
Enoxacin −1.78 Inactive 13.7
Acrosoxacin −0.68 N.C. 23.5
Rufloxacin 0.51 N.C. 31.0
Irloxacin −3.63 Inactive 47.2
Pipemidic acid −1.97 Inactive >250.0
Flumequine −1.96 Inactive >250.0
Piromidic acid −4.43 Inactive >250.0
Nalidixic acid −3.65 Inactive >250.0
Cinoxacin −2.24 Inactive >250.0
Oxolinic acid −3.25 Inactive >250.0
a

N.C., not classified.