Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 31;17(5):e202100732. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.202100732

Table 1.

Physicochemical properties and biological data of andrographolide and derivatives.

Compd

logD7.4 [a]

TPSA[b]2]

%PPB[c]

MM‐GBSA ΔG Bind[d] [kcal/mol]

ARE specificity ratio, SR[e]

Vero‐E6 plaque reduction assay NT50 [f] [μM]

1

1.4

87

88

−26.2

19.4

1.4

2

2.4

67

93

−29.4

5.7

>10

3

2.4

67

93

−31.8

n.d.[g]

>10

4

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

−45.8

n.d.

n.d.

9

1.4

87

88

−29.4

211

2.1

11

n.d.

87

n.d.

n.a.[h]

n.d.

>10

16 a

1.9

96

83

−27.3

35.6

3.7

16 b

2.5

96

38

−36.4

10.8

8.1

16 c

1.3

133

92

n.a.

13.3

>10

[a] Experimental distribution coefficient at pH 7.4. [b] Topological polar surface area. [c] Plasma protein binding values were estimated by an HPLC‐based method. [d] An estimate for the binding affinity derived from computational docking. The estimate does not include contributions from the covalent interaction. A more negative value indicates stronger binding. [e] SR≤1, not specific; 1≤SR≤10, moderately specific; 10≤SR≤100, specific; 100≤SR, highly specific. See also equation 4 in the Supporting Information. [f] Analyte titers at which 50 % neutralization (NT50) was recorded. [g] Not determined. [h] Not available. The binding affinity cannot be reliably estimated: 11 is a non‐electrophilic compound; 16 c has a long and flexible solvent‐exposed linker.