Table 3.
Predominant variants |
SARS-CoV-2-naive patients |
SARS-CoV-2-exposed patients |
Protective efficacy (95% CI)* | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before the study† | During the study | Cumulative follow-up in person-years‡ | Number of individuals with an event | Cumulative follow-up in person-years‡ | Number of individuals with an event | ||
Belgium | Alpha | Alpha | 65·0 | 4 | 8·7 | 0 | 100% (−1032 to 100) |
Brazil | Gamma | Gamma (57%); delta (13%) | 290·7 | 53 | 128·1 | 3 | 87·2% (60·4 to 97·4) |
Colombia | Alpha, gamma, mu, lambda | Mu (49%); gamma (10%); B.1.623 (7%); lambda (6%) | 199·5 | 123 | 168·4 | 22 | 78·8% (66·5 to 87·2) |
Philippines | Alpha | Delta 29%); beta (15%); alpha (14%); theta (3%) | 486·8 | 132 | 847·3 | 38 | 83·5% (76·1 to 88·8) |
South Africa | Beta | Delta (61%); beta (7%) | 46·9 | 41 | 40·0 | 2 | 94·3% (78·0 to 99·3) |
Overall | .. | .. | 1088·9 | 353 | 1192·5 | 65 | 83·2% (78·0 to 87·3) |
95% CI for protective efficacy was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method, which was based on conditional binomial distribution.
Sourced from Nextstrain and the Philippines Genome center .
Cumulative follow-up was calculated in all participants at risk within each group using the time period from 14 days after the first dose to analysis cutoff on Aug 10, 2021.