Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 21;30:e3515. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.5452.3515

Table 1. Demographic and academic characteristics of the students. Curitiba, PR, Brazil, 2020.

Characteristics Intervention Group - (n=27) Control Group (n=24) Total p-value
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Age (years old), mean±standard deviation 22.2±3.2 21.8±2.0 22±2.7 0.950*
Gender
Female 22 (81.5) 20 (83.3) 42 (82.4) 1.00
Male 5 (18.5) 4 (16.7) 9 (17.6)
Schooling
First graduation 27 (100.0) 23 (95.8) 50 (98.0) 0.476
Bachelor’s degree in another field 0 (0.0) 1 (4.2) 1 (2.0)
Perceived confidence to identify diagnoses
Not at all confident 1 (3.7) 3 (12.5) 4 (7.8) 0.234
Somewhat confident 12 (44.4) 13 (54.2) 25 (49.0)
Confident 14 (51.9) 7 (29.2) 21 (41.2)
No answer 0 (0.0) 1 (4.2) 1 (2.0)
Perceived confidence in the knowledge needed to identify diagnoses and causes
A little 5 (18.5) 8 (33.3) 13 (25.5) 0.332
Very much 21 (77.8) 15 (62.5) 36 (70.6)
Total 1 (3.7) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.0)
No answer 0 (0.0) 1 (4.2) 1 (2.0)
Perceived confidence in the knowledge needed to identify important clues
Not at all confident 0 (0.0) 1 (4.2) 1 (2.0) 0.488
Somewhat confident 8 (29.6) 10 (41.7) 18 (35.3)
Confident 17 (63.0) 11 (45.8) 28 (54.9)
Very confident 2 (7.4) 1 (4.2) 3 (5.9)
No answer 0 (0.0) 1 (4.2) 1 (2.0)
Perception regarding the use of knowledge from the care provided to a similar patient/personal experience
Yes 11 (40.7) 10 (41.7) 21 (41.2)
No 16 (59.3) 13 (54.2) 28 (54.9)
No answer 0 (0.0) 1 (4.2) 1 (2.0)

*Mann-Whitney’s test; Fisher’s Exact test