. 2022 Apr 1;9(2):e32399. doi: 10.2196/32399

Table 3.

Mean number of tool uses over 6 months: 4 standard implementation sites as compared with 3 ways of grouping intervention sites.

Comparisons	Tool uses: 6 months, mean (SD)^a		Median difference P value^b	Median difference (95% CI)^b
	A sites	B sites
Standard implementation sites (A) versus the original 4 facilities randomized to enhanced implementation (intention to treat; B₁)	3.5 (3.7)	190.3 (174.8)	.03	155.5 (14-416)
Standard implementation sites (A) versus the 3 facilities that participated in the enhanced implementation program (as treated); B₂)	3.5 (3.7)	224.3 (197.1)	.049	231.0 (14-416)
Standard implementation sites (A) versus the 3 facilities that had a full-time screening coordinator engaged in SDM^c discussions with patients (key resource scenario; B₃)	3.5 (3.7)	246.0 (164.9)	.049	231.0 (79-416)

^aTotal tool uses across all the sites in the group divided by the number of sites in the group.

^bOn the basis of the Wilcoxon rank-sum test using the medians of the differences (Hodges-Lehmann estimator) between sites in the 2 groups.

^cSDM: shared decision-making.