Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar;26(3):361–375. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24135

Table 6.

Assessment of certainty of evidence using GRADE criteria

Question: Can neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at admission predict severity in COVID-19?
Sensitivity 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69–0.80) Prevalences 20%, 30%, 50%            
Specificity 0.74 (95% CI: 0.70–0.78)            
      Factors that may decrease certainty of evidence Effect per 1,000 patients tested
Outcome No. of studies (No. of patients) Study design Risk of bias Indirectness Inconsistency Imprecision Publication bias pretest probability of 20% pretest probability of 30% pretest probability of 50% Test accuracy CoE
True-positives (patients with severity) 24 studies 1,638 patients Cohort and case-control type studies Not serious seriousa Seriousb Not serious All plausible residual confounding would reduce the demonstrated effect 150
(138–160)
225
(207–240)
375
(345–400)
⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATE
False-negatives (patients incorrectly classified as not having severity)               50 (40–62) 75 (60–93) 125
(100–155)
 
True-negatives (patients without severity) 24 studies 2,442 patients Cohort and case-control type studies Not serious seriousa Seriousb Not serious All plausible residual confounding would reduce the demonstrated effect 592
(560–624)
518
(490–546)
370
(350–390)
⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATE
False-positives (patients incorrectly classified as having severity)               208 (176–240) 182 (154–210) 130 (110–150)  
True positives (patients with mortality) 15 studies 564 patients Cohort and case-control type studies Not serious Not serious seriousa Not serious All plausible residual confounding would reduce the demonstrated effect 80 (72–85) 160 (144–170) 240
(216–255)
⨁⨁⨁⨁
HIGH
False negatives (patients incorrectly classified as not having mortality)               20 (15–28) 40 (30–56) 60 (45–84)  
True negatives (patients without mortality) 15 studies 3276 patients Cohort and case-control type studies Not serious Not serious seriousa Not serious All plausible residual confounding would reduce the demonstrated effect 702 (630–765) 624 (560–680) 546 (490–595) ⨁⨁⨁⨁
HIGH
False positives (patients incorrectly classified as having mortality)               198 (135–270) 176 (120–240) 154 (105–210)