Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 19:1–21. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s00521-022-07258-6

Table 5.

Comparative average rounds of cross-validation results of five CNN models for TB detection in the combined dataset without augmentation in nine angles

Schema Dataset CNN models Average weighted
Accuracy (%) Recall (%) Precision (%) F1-Score (%) Specificity (%) Kappa value (%)

Without

Segmentation

Without

Augmentation

Montgomery

dataset

ResNet50 68.7 73.1 71.3 72.3 61.7 34.9
Xception 73.9 77.5 77.5 77.5 69.0 46.5
InceptionRenNetV2 77.5 78.2 85.0 81.4 76.5 53.1
MobileNet 68.9 73.4 72.5 73.0 62.7 36.2
EfficientNetB3 82.80 83.3 87.5 85.4 81.5 64.0

Shenzhen

dataset

ResNet50 77.0 76.7 76.7 76.7 77.4 54.1
Xception 80.1 81.7 76.7 79.1 78.7 60.1
InceptionRenNetV2 83.8 85.2 81.3 83.2 82.6 67.6
MobileNet 79.3 79.4 78.2 78.8 79.2 58.6
EfficientNetB3 87.6 89.4 85.0 87.1 86.1 75.2

Combination

dataset

ResNet50 88.7 82.8 87.8 85.2 92.6 76.1
Xception 87.4 79.6 88.7 83.9 92.9 73.7
InceptionRenNetV2 90.6 84.7 91.1 87.8 94.6 80.2
MobileNet 88.6 81.3 89.9 85.4 93.7 76.1
EfficientNetB3 90.3 84.5 90.1 87.2 94.0 79.4

With

Segmentation

Without

Augmentation

Montgomery

dataset

ResNet50 73.2 77.2 76.3 76.7 67.8 45.1
Xception 77.0 79.3 81.2 73.2 73.2 52.2
InceptionRenNetV2 81.2 83.8 83.8 83.8 77.6 61.3
MobileNet 72.5 76.9 75.0 75.9 66.7 43.8
EfficientNetB3 85.5 88.5 86.3 87.3 81.7 70.4

Shenzhen

dataset

ResNet50 84.7 86.6 81.6 84.0 83.1 69.5
Xception 86.1 88.0 85.5 84.5 84.5 72.2
InceptionRenNetV2 89.6 90.8 87.7 89.2 88.5 79.1
MobileNet 86.3 88.3 83.1 85.6 84.5 72.5
EfficientNetB3 90.3 91.7 88.3 90.0 89.1 80.6

Combination

dataset

ResNet50 88.5 84.3 84.7 84.5 91.0 74.4
Xception 89.9 86.1 86.7 86.4 91.2 78.3
InceptionRenNetV2 90.8 87.5 87.8 87.5 92.8 80.4
MobileNet 90.7 86.9 88.2 87.5 93.0 80.1
EfficientNetB3 91.2 87.4 88.9 88.2 93.4 81.1

The best result of each set has been bolded