Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 15;2014(8):CD005355. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005355.pub5

Celik 2003.

Methods Single centre study
Described as randomised, but no details on how patients were allocated to trial interventions
 Both patients, care providers, and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation
 Power calculation: performed
 No losses to follow up, and all patients were analysed in groups to which they were assigned
 Source of funding: not mentioned
Participants Setting: university hospital, Elazig, Turkey
 Inclusion criteria: symptomatic uterine fibroids scheduled for myomectomy
 n = 25
 Mean age: 31.7 years (SD 4.4) in the treatment arm and 32.2 years (SD 2.9) in the placebo group
 Ethnicity: not mentioned
Interventions Treatment arm (n = 13): 400 uG misoprostol administered vaginally 1 hour before surgery
 Control arm (n = 12): placebo of identical shape and colour
 Sizes of fibroids: mean diameter of myomas 150.7 mm (SD 28.6) in the treatment arm and 154.2 mm (SD 24.7) in the control arm
 Type of operation: laparotomy
Outcomes Perioperative blood loss, postoperative haemoglobin, operation time, blood transfusion, hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity
Blood loss determined by aspiration equipment during the operation
Notes Indication for myomectomy: symptomatic uterine fibroid
Authors not contacted
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Described as randomised, but no details on how patients were allocated to trial interventions
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No incomplete outcome data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk We do not have access to the study protocol
Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Both participants and personnel were blinded to treatment allocation
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation