Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 15;2014(8):CD005355. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005355.pub5

Frederick 1994.

Methods Single centre study
 Randomisation by drawing numbers from a box. The numbers ranged from 1 to 20: when an odd number was drawn the patient received vasopressin, whereas an even number resulted in placebo being given
 Patients, care providers, and outcome assessors were blinded
 Power calculation: performed but study stopped half‐way and the code broken because of heavy bleeding in 10 patients
 No losses to follow up, and all patients were analysed in groups to which they were assigned
 Source of funding: not mentioned
Participants Setting: university hospital, Kingston, Jamaica
 Inclusion criteria: symptomatic uterine myoma at least size of 14 weeks gestation
Exclusion criteria: contraindication to vasopressin (notably cardiovascular and respiratory diseases)
 n = 20
 Median age: 32 years (range 24‐40)
 Ethnicity: not described
 Sizes of fibroids: 5.3‐14.0 cm
Interventions Treatment (n = 10): injection into the broad ligaments of 20 units/ml of vasopressin (i.e. 1ml diluted in 19 ml saline) made up at the time of surgery
 Control: n = 10, Injection of placebo (20 ml normal saline)
 Type of operation: laparotomy
Outcomes Perioperative blood loss, blood transfusion
Notes Indications for myomectomy: menorrhagia, recurrent miscarriage, subfertility
Authors not contacted
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation by drawing numbers from a box
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No incomplete outcome data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk We do not have access to the study protocol
Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Participants and personnel were blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcome assessors were blinded