Table 2:
Mean reliabilities and stabilities of the a priori ROIs by task, contrast, data cleaning approach, and movement quartile
| Task | Contrast | QC | QC+OR | QC+MV+OR | QC+Rank | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W BL | W FU | Between | W BL | W FU | Between | W BL | W FU | Between | W BL | W FU | Between | ||
| MID | Anticipation loss vs neutral | 0.06 (0.02) | 0.10 (0.03) | 0.04 (0.01) | 0.07 (0.02) | 0.09 (0.02) | 0.04 (0.01) | 0.06 (0.02) | 0.09 (0.02) | 0.04 (0.01) | 0.07 (0.02) | 0.10 (0.03) | 0.04 (0.01) |
| MID | Anticipation reward vs neutral | 0.08 (0.05) | 0.10 (0.04) | 0.07 (0.04) | 0.11 (0.05) | 0.12 (0.05) | 0.07 (0.04) | 0.11 (0.05) | 0.11 (0.05) | 0.07 (0.04) | 0.10 (0.05) | 0.11 (0.04) | 0.08 (0.04) |
| MID | Reward positive vs negative feedback | 0.08 (0.03) | 0.15 (0.04) | 0.05 (0.02) | 0.12 (0.02) | 0.12 (0.02) | 0.05 (0.02) | 0.12 (0.02) | 0.12 (0.02) | 0.05 (0.02) | 0.12 (0.02) | 0.14 (0.03) | 0.05 (0.01) |
| nBack | 2 back vs 0 back | 0.12 (0.06) | 0.17 (0.09) | 0.12 (0.07) | 0.17 (0.08) | 0.23 (0.11) | 0.16 (0.07) | 0.17 (0.08) | 0.23 (0.11) | 0.16 (0.07) | 0.16 (0.08) | 0.23 (0.11) | 0.16 (0.08) |
| nBack | Emotion vs neutral face | 0.02 (0.03) | 0.02 (0.02) | 0.02 (0.02) | 0.01 (0.01) | 0.01 (0.02) | 0.03 (0.02) | 0.01 (0.01) | 0.01 (0.02) | 0.03 (0.02) | 0.01 (0.01) | 0.01 (0.02) | 0.03 (0.02) |
| nBack | Face vs place | 0.09 (0.10) | 0.08 (0.08) | 0.11 (0.12) | 0.10 (0.10) | 0.10 (0.11) | 0.11 (0.10) | 0.10 (0.10) | 0.10 (0.11) | 0.11 (0.10) | 0.10 (0.10) | 0.10 (0.10) | 0.11 (0.10) |
| SST | Correct stop vs correct go | 0.07 (0.04) | 0.10 (0.05) | 0.07 (0.02) | 0.12 (0.04) | 0.11 (0.04) | 0.07 (0.02) | 0.12 (0.03) | 0.11 (0.04) | 0.07 (0.02) | 0.10 (0.03) | 0.12 (0.04) | 0.07 (0.02) |
| SST | Incorrect stop vs correct go | 0.11 (0.02) | 0.17 (0.04) | 0.08 (0.02) | 0.15 (0.04) | 0.17 (0.03) | 0.09 (0.02) | 0.15 (0.04) | 0.17 (0.03) | 0.09 (0.02) | 0.14 (0.03) | 0.18 (0.03) | 0.09 (0.02) |
| Task | Contrast | 1st Movement Quartile | 2nd Movement Quartile | 3rd Movement Quartile | 4th Movement Quartile | ||||||||
| W BL | W FU | Between | W BL | W FU | Between | W BL | W FU | Between | W BL | W FU | Between | ||
| MID | Anticipation loss vs neutral | 0.10 (0.04) | 0.11 (0.06) | 0.08 (0.03) | 0.08 (0.06) | 0.11 (0.06) | 0.07 (0.05) | 0.08 (0.04) | 0.11 (0.04) | 0.05 (0.04) | 0.08 (0.03) | 0.08 (0.05) | 0.05 (0.04) |
| MID | Anticipation reward vs neutral | 0.18 (0.08) | 0.21 (0.06) | 0.14 (0.06) | 0.13 (0.09) | 0.21 (0.06) | 0.07 (0.05) | 0.18 (0.05) | 0.14 (0.07) | 0.05 (0.03) | 0.05 (0.03) | 0.05 (0.04) | 0.05 (0.03) |
| MID | Reward positive vs negative feedback | 0.16 (0.03) | 0.08 (0.04) | 0.08 (0.04) | 0.14 (0.05) | 0.08 (0.04) | 0.07 (0.04) | 0.11 (0.04) | 0.15 (0.06) | 0.09 (0.05) | 0.09 (0.03) | 0.11 (0.06) | 0.09 (0.05) |
| nBack | 2 back vs 0 back | 0.34 (0.14) | 0.35 (0.09) | 0.25 (0.10) | 0.23 (0.15) | 0.35 (0.09) | 0.16 (0.11) | 0.18 (0.11) | 0.17 (0.10) | 0.16 (0.09) | 0.08 (0.04) | 0.15 (0.05) | 0.16 (0.09) |
| nBack | Emotion vs neutral face | 0.02 (0.03) | 0.02 (0.03) | 0.04 (0.02) | 0.01 (0.02) | 0.02 (0.03) | 0.04 (0.04) | 0.04 (0.03) | 0.01 (0.02) | 0.06 (0.04) | 0.01 (0.02) | 0.02 (0.03) | 0.06 (0.04) |
| nBack | Face vs place | 0.20 (0.16) | 0.17 (0.14) | 0.18 (0.16) | 0.15 (0.13) | 0.17 (0.14) | 0.13 (0.11) | 0.10 (0.10) | 0.07 (0.12) | 0.11 (0.09) | 0.08 (0.05) | 0.04 (0.05) | 0.11 (0.09) |
| SST | Correct stop vs correct go | 0.21 (0.06) | 0.17 (0.06) | 0.14 (0.05) | 0.22 (0.07) | 0.17 (0.06) | 0.10 (0.06) | 0.12 (0.04) | 0.10 (0.07) | 0.08 (0.04) | 0.02 (0.02) | 0.03 (0.03) | 0.08 (0.04) |
| SST | Incorrect stop vs correct go | 0.27 (0.08) | 0.21 (0.06) | 0.17 (0.04) | 0.20 (0.06) | 0.21 (0.06) | 0.12 (0.04) | 0.07 (0.03) | 0.20 (0.06) | 0.03 (0.03) | 0.06 (0.03) | 0.08 (0.05) | 0.03 (0.03) |
Task, contrast, and data subset specific mean (standard deviation) reliability (within session) and between session stability values for the a priori ROI analyses. Results indicate reliability/stability are poor and increase only slightly with data cleaning and exclusion of high movement participants. Bold values under QC+OR, QC+MV+OR, or QC+Rank columns indicate values for that data cleaning approach were significantly greater than for the QC dataset. Bold values under the 1st Movement Quartile (lowest motion) columns indicate values were significantly greater than those for the 4th Movement Quartile (highest motion). Significance tested using paired t-test with FDR correction across 8 contrasts. W BL = Within Baseline session reliability; W FU = Within Follow-Up session reliability; Between = Between session stability.