Comparison of the proposed method with some reported methods for the enrichment and determination of UVFs in water.

Methods	Extraction time (min)	Linear ranges (μg L−1)	LODs (μg L−1)	RSDs (%)	Recovery (%)	Ref.
TiO2NSs-SPME-HPLC-UVa	30	0.1–400	0.026–0.089	4.5–9.6	88.8–107	21
PIL-SPME-HPLC-UVb	60	0.5–200	0.10–5.00	1.8–11.6	54.5–120	27
PDMS-SBSE-HPLC-MSc	180	0.025–1	0.0025–0.01	<26	25–89	41
PDMS-SPME-GC-FIDd	45	10–500	0.26–0.51bb	<8	85–97	42
PA-SPME-GC-FID	45	10–500	0.35–0.74bb	<8	82–99	42
C12-SPME-HPLC-UVe	60	5–200	0.69–1.37	3.5–19.7	82–93	43
PA-SPME-GC-MS	45	0.5–25	0.17–0.29	0.7–4.3	80–83	44
TiO2-SPME-HPLC-UV	45	0.05–100	0.007–0.064	4.5–9.1	61.2–110	This method

^aTiO₂NSs, TiO₂ nanosheets.

^bPIL, polymeric ionic liquids.

^cSBSE, stir-bar sorptive extraction, MS, mass spectrometry.

^dFID, flame ionization detection.

^eC₁₂, dodecyl.