Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Issues. 2017 Jan 2;39(4):1008–1029. doi: 10.1177/0192513x16684894

Table 3.

Relative Risk Ratios From Multinomial Logistic Regression Model Estimating Adolescent Pregnancy Expectations.

Reference: Nonexistent expectations
Low Split Elevated
Family predictors
 Household routines 0.984 (0.008) 0.975* (0.010) 0.995 (0.012)
 Parental monitoring 0.990 (0.013) 0.990 (0.016) 0.993 (0.019)
Parenting style (ref: authoritative)
  Uninvolved 0.987 (0.125) 0.895 (0.140) 1.030 (0.186)
  Permissive 1.143 (0.103) 1.101 (0.125) 1.178 (0.162)
  Authoritarian 0.996 (0.119) 1.046 (0.151) 1.224 (0.209)
School predictors
 Grades in eighth grade 1.067* (0.028) 1.006 (0.031) 0.962 (0.035)
 College expectations 0.996*** (0.001) 0.992*** (0.001) 0.988*** (0.002)
 Ever suspended 0.822* (0.082) 1.160 (0.131) 1.029 (0.136)
 Number of schools 1.133* (0.065) 1.224** (0.081) 1.151 (0.090)
Peer predictors
 Frequency of dating 1.049 (0.031) 1.074* (0.039) 1.089 (0.048)
 Delinquency 0.967 (0.026) 1.038 (0.031) 1.075* (0.037)
 Substance use 1.192*** (0.051) 1.122* (0.058) 1.134* (0.070)
 Early sexual debut 0.899 (0.101) 0.955 (0.121) 1.502** (0.209)
Constant 0.014*** (0.014) 0.000*** (0.000) 0.000*** (0.000)

Note. n = 4,373. Pseudo R2 = .056. Relative risk ratios are presented. Standard errors are in parentheses. Data are unweighted. All models include controls for age, gender, race/ethnicity, parent education, family structure, maternal teen birth, and religion.

p < .1.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.