Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 12;2022:7948010. doi: 10.1155/2022/7948010

Table 2.

Relationship between the expression of CEACAM1 and TGF-β in cancer tissues and clinicopathologic features (n (%)).

Clinicopathologic parameters Cases Relative expression of CEACAM1 Relative expression of TGF-β
Positive χ 2 P value Positive χ 2 P value
Gender Male 64 40(62.5) 1.105 0.552 46(71.8) 1.542 0.493
Female 36 23(63.9) 25(69.4)
Age (years) ≥60 45 30(66.7) 1.455 0.255 33(73.3) 1.176 0.301
<60 55 31(56.4) 37(67.2)
Tumor diameter (cm) <3 41 24(58.5) 1.071 0.769 27(65.8) 2.947 0.804
≥3 59 38(64.4) 44(74.6)
Tumor types Adenocarcinoma 55 34(61.8) 1.258 0.212 39(70.9) 7.258 0.189
Squamous cell carcinomas 47 40(85.1) 42(89.4)
Lymph node metastasis Yes 45 34(75.6) 6.463 ≤0.001 37(82.2) 6.281 ≤0.001
No 35 8(24) 13(37.1)
Clinical staging I, II 43 20(47) 5.179 0.022 25(58.1) 7.817 ≤0.001
III, IV 57 47(82) 51(89.5)
The degree of differentiation Low/medium 66 57(86.4) 10.847 ≤0.001 60(90.9) 8.650 ≤0.001
High 34 17(50) 21(61.8)