Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 14;28(4):798–808. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01718-1

Fig. 4. Viability and morphology of mouse, porcine, human and SC-beta islets following cryopreservation.

Fig. 4

a, Morphology of mouse islets from live control, VR (cryopreserved by VR) and conventional (cryopreserved by conventional slow freezing) was evaluated by brightfield microscopy, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histology, and TEM. For the conventional group, a mixture of intact and disrupted islets was observed. Examples of disrupted islet gross morphology due to ice formation are shown in the brightfield and H&E histology. b, Viability (percentage of live control) of mouse, SC-beta, porcine and human islets from treatment groups including live control, VR, VR 9 months (islets stored in LN2 for 9 months before rewarming), conventional (cryopreserved by conventional slow freezing) and dead control (treated by 75% ethanol). ND, not done. One-way ANOVA with Games–Howell post hoc test was used to compare groups, and P values from informative pairwise comparisons are shown (n = 3–34 per group; exact number in Supplementary Table 3). c, Confocal microscope images (AO/PI) of mouse, SC-beta, porcine and human islets from treatment groups, including live control, VR and conventional. d, TUNEL-stained images of mouse, SC-beta and human islets from treatment groups, including live control, VR and conventional. Bottom panel is Annexin V staining of mouse islets from the same treatment groups. Scale bars represent 2 µm for TEM, 50 µm for brightfield images, 70 µm for histology and TUNEL images and 100 µm for all fluorescence images. Data are shown as individual data points and mean ± s.d.