Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 19;13:2085. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29709-3

Fig. 3. Low production well site CH4 emissions data as reported in previous studies.

Fig. 3

a CH4 emissions data for six basins with at least n > 5 observations shown as box plots (centerline, median; box limits, upper and lower quartiles; whiskers, 1.5× interquartile range) and individual points (gray circles). Sample sizes are shown at the bottom of the plot. Only site-level measurements above method detection limits of 0.01–0.036 kg/h are shown. Appal.—Appalachian (Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia); Delaware (Texas/New Mexico); Barnett (Texas); Uinta (Utah); UGR—Upper Green River (Wyoming); DJB—Denver-Julesburg Basin (Colorado). Low production well site data were a subset of site-level measurements reported by: Robertson et al13., Robertson et al21., Caulton et al12., Omara et al10., Omara et al17. and Brantley et al20. b Relationship between measured site-level CH4 emissions and O&G production in barrels of oil equivalent per day (boed). The plot shows the top 5% of high-emitting sites (n = 12, green symbols), the bottom 95% of sites (n = 192, blue symbols), and below-detection-limit (BDL) sites (n = 36, gray symbols). Each site’s CH4 loss rate is indicated by the size of the circles. Oil-only sites or sites with reported CH4 loss rates >100% are assigned values of 100%. The orange and pink symbols represent the mean wellhead-only CH4 and O&G production for low production sites sampled in Ohio22 and West Virginia31. Data from these two studies were not used in emission models because they exclude other sources such as tanks and separators, but are shown here to illustrate that wellhead-only CH4 emissions can be significant even at low production well sites. The solid-dark red line shows the nonparametric Bayesian regression model for the bottom 95% of sites (see Methods).