Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 12;2022:9998280. doi: 10.1155/2022/9998280

Table 2.

The comparison of the tumor characteristics using JNET classification between BLI-LED and BLI-LASER.

JNET Total n (%) HP n (%) SSL n (%) LGA n (%) HGD n (%) T1- n (%) Diagnostic accuracy
Overall
Experts
Non-experts
BLI-LED 89.6∗
90.1∗∗
89.2∗∗∗
1 13 (100) 6 (46) 7 (54) 0 0 0
2A 7 (100) 0 0 5 (71) 2 (29) 0
2B 15 (100) 0 0 4 (27) 10 (66) 1 (7)
3 2 (100) 0 0 0 0 2 (100)

BLI-LASER 88.3+
87.4++
89.2+++
1 13 (100) 6 (46) 7 (54) 0 0 0
2A 10 (100) 0 0 9 (90) 1 (10) 0
2B 11 (100) 0 0 0 11 (100) 0
3 3 (100) 0 0 0 0 3 (100)

∗ vs. +: p = 0.65, ∗∗ vs. ++: p = 0.52, ∗∗∗ vs. +++: p = 0.99. JNET: Japanese narrow band imaging team classification, BLI-LED: magnified blue light imaging, BLI-LASER: magnified blue laser imaging, HP: hyperplastic polyp, SSL: sessile serrated lesions, LGA: low-grade adenoma, HGD: high-grade dysplasia, T1-: cancer invading deeper into the submucosal layer.