Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 2;62(3):807–817. doi: 10.47162/RJME.62.3.19

Table 3.

Comparative evaluation of the levels of depression and social adjustment in the two groups of patients

Study group

HAM-D scores initial evaluation

HAM-D<14

HAM-D 14–17

HAM-D>17

M group, n (%)

15 (11.03%)

69 (50.74%)

52 (38.24%)

P group, n (%)

11 (8.03%)

67 (48.91%)

59 (43.07%)

Total, n (%)

26 (9.52%)

136 (49.82%)

111 (40.66%)

Study group

HAM-D scores final evaluation

HAM-D<14

HAM-D 14–17

HAM-D>17

M group, n (%)

98 (72.06%)

30 (22.06%)

8 (5.88%)

P group, n (%)

121 (88.32%)

13 (9.49%)

3 (2.19%)

Total, n (%)

219 (80.22%)

43 (15.75%)

11 (4.03%)

Study group

GAF scores initial evaluation

GAF<50

GAF>50

M group, n (%)

134 (98.53%)

2 (1.47%)

P group, n (%)

133 (97.08%)

4 (2.92%)

Total, n (%)

267 (97.80%)

6 (2.20%)

Study group

GAF scores final evaluation

GAF<50

GAF>50

M group, n (%)

42 (30.88%)

94 (69.12%)

P group, n (%)

9 (6.57%)

128 (93.43%)

Total, n (%)

51 (18.68%)

222 (81.32%)

GAF: Global Assessment of Functioning; HAM-D: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; M: Medication group; n: No. of cases; P: Psychotherapy and medication group