Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 27;62(4):577–588. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab129

Table 3.

Hierarchical Binary Logistic Regression Models of Predictors of Dietary Changes and Physical Activity (N = 85)

Dietary changes Physical activity
Predictor b OR [95% CI] b OR [95% CI] b OR [95% CI] b OR [95% CI] b OR [95% CI] b OR [95% CI]
Model 1
(Constant) 2.16 8.64 1.47 4.36 3.97 52.97 0.06 1.06 −0.12 0.88 6.86 951.00
Age (years) −0.08 0.93* [0.87–0.99] −0.07 0.94 [0.87–1.00] −0.14 0.87 [0.70–1.08] −0.04 0.97 [0.91–1.02] −0.04 0.96 [0.91–1.02] −0.28 0.75* [0.59–0.97]
Malea −0.41 0.66 [0.24–1.84] −0.47 0.62 [0.22–1.76] 3.00 20.06 [0.26–1527.26] −0.41 0.66 [0.26–1.69] −0.40 0.67 [0.26–1.73] 2.00 7.41 [0.11–515.19]
Education (years) 0.12 1.13 [0.91–1.40] 0.11 1.11 [0.90–1.38] 0.21 1.23 [0.50–3.01] 0.10 1.11 [0.91–1.34] 0.10 1.10 [0.91–1.34] 0.66 1.93 [0.71–5.20]
Time since MCI diagnosis (months) 0.01 1.01 [0.99–1.02] 0.01 1.01 [0.99–1.02] 0.01 1.01 [0.95–1.07] <0.01 1.00 [0.99–1.02] <0.01 1.00 [0.99–1.02] 0.01 1.01 [0.95–1.07]
Comorbid conditionsb 0.18 1.20 [0.82–1.75] 0.11 1.11 [0.75–1.66] −0.47 0.63 [0.08–5.10] 0.18 1.20 [0.83–1.72] 0.17 1.18 [0.81–1.73] 0.14 1.15 [0.15–8.64]
Model 2
Coherence 0.01 1.01 [0.91–1.13] 0.13 1.14 [0.93–1.38] 0.02 1.02 [0.93–1.13] 0.08 1.09 [0.89–1.33]
Causality 0.79 2.21 [0.63–7.73] 1.87 6.49 [0.38–110.21] 0.04 1.04 [0.31–3.55] −0.43 0.65 [0.02–26.95]
Model 3c
Coherence × Age <0.01 1.00 [0.99–1.02] 0.02 1.02* [1.00–1.03]
Coherence × Male −0.21 0.81 [0.63–1.04] −0.12 0.89 [0.70–1.13]
Coherence × Education −0.01 0.99 [0.94–1.05] −0.04 0.97 [0.91–1.02]
Coherence × Time since MCI diagnosis <−0.01 1.00 [0.99–1.00] <−0.01 1.00 [0.10–1.00]
Coherence × Comorbid conditions 0.03 1.03 [0.91–1.17] −0.01 0.99 [0.88–1.11]
Causality × Age −0.02 0.98 [0.72–1.32] −0.15 0.86 [0.55–1.35]
Causality × Male −1.56 0.21 [<0.01–16.79] −3.28 0.04 [<0.01–11.31]
Causality × Education 0.35 1.41 [0.56–3.60] 0.10 1.12 [0.51–2.41]
Causality × Time since MCI diagnosis 0.06 1.06 [0.98–1.15] −0.07 0.94 [0.84–1.05]
Causality × Comorbid conditions 0.32 1.38 [0.43–4.38] 1.25 3.49 [0.78–15.54]
Model GOF test (Hosmer– Lemeshow, p) .51 .22 .45 .68 .98 .71
Omnibus test (χ 2 (df), p) 7.51 (5), .19 9.12 (7), .24 18.08 (17), .38 3.56 (5), .61 3.79 (7), .80 18.43 (17), .36
Model predictivity (Nagelkerke R2) 0.12 0.15 0.28 0.06 0.06 0.27

Note: b = unstandardized regression coefficients; CI = confidence interval; GOF = goodness of fit; OR = odds ratio; MCI = mild cognitive impairment.

aFemale was treated as the reference category for sex.

bThe number of comorbid conditions was calculated with the exception of MCI.

cFor interaction terms, age, years of education, and the number of comorbid conditions were mean centered due to multicollinearity.

*p < .05.