Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Physiol. 2022 Mar 6;600(8):1913–1932. doi: 10.1113/JP282237

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Coronary flow dynamics in rest versus exercise. A. Model-predicted total LAD flow under resting control conditions is compared to measured flow. B. Predicted contributions of subendocardial, midwall, and subepicardial flow to total LAD flow under resting conditions are shown. C. Model-predicted total LAD flow under exercise conditions is compared to measured flow. D. Predicted contributions of subendocardial, midwall, and subepicardial flow to total LAD flow under exercise conditions are shown. In both rest and exercise conditions the model simulations reflect the integrated model using the top-ranked using the ‘F M’, flow times MVO2, metabolic signal.