Table 4.
The comparison results between our proposed model and other models on the TuSimple dataset.
| Method | ACC (%) | PRE | REC | F1-Measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENet | 97.84 | 0.854 | 0.952 | 0.900 |
| SCNN | 96.79 | 0.652 | 0.806 | 0.720 |
| LaneNet | 97.94 | 0.871 | 0.926 | 0.900 |
| SegNet | 97.73 | 0.809 | 0.869 | 0.838 |
| SegNet_ConvLSTM | 97.95 | 0.848 | 0.965 | 0.901 |
| U-Net | 97.91 | 0.861 | 0.945 | 0.902 |
| U-Net_ConvLSTM | 98.21 | 0.856 | 0.958 | 0.904 |
| Proposed model | 97.98 | 0.868 | 0.950 | 0.909 |