Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 20;12:6494. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10517-0

Table 3.

Hepatic oxidative (MDA) and antioxidative (GSH and SOD) parameters in EAC-bearing mice after treatment with amygdalin and/or sorafenib.

Groups MDA (nmol/g tissue) GSH (nmol/g tissue) SOD (U/g tissue)
Cnt 3.98 ± 0.11f 6.31 ± 0.16b 58.63 ± 1.23a
Amy 4.01 ± 0.14f 7.22 ± 0.23a 54.09 ± 1.99a
SorIP 4.08 ± 0.09f 6.06 ± 0.19b 55.28 ± 1.76a
SorOS 4.17 ± 0.17f 6.13 ± 0.18b 56.21 ± 2.38a
Amy + SorIP 4.12 ± 0.15f 5.98 ± 0.14b 54.14 ± 2.14a
Amy + SorOS 4.23 ± 0.16f 6.04 ± 0.15b 56.82 ± 1.77a
EAC 23.58 ± 0.76a 3.23 ± 0.11e 25.26 ± 0.54g
EAC + Amy 15.37 ± 0.43b 4.43 ± 0.13d 32.12 ± 0.77f
EAC + SorIP 10.50 ± 0.35d 5.14 ± 0.14c 39.32 ± 0.54d
EAC + SorOS 13.51 ± 0.32c 5.03 ± 0.15c 36.39 ± 0.42e
EAC + Amy + SorIP 7.30 ± 0.26e 6.35 ± 0.22b 47.05 ± 1.01b
EAC + Amy + SorOS 9.76 ± 0.36d 5.33 ± 0.16c 42.31 ± 0.63c

Data were presented as means ± SEM. Small (a–g) letters showed the marked change at P ≤ 0.05. The significant were expressed by dissimilar letters in the same column.