Table 5.
Follow-up period |
Model 1 HR (95%CI) |
Wald, df | P-value |
Model 2 HR (95%CI) |
Wald, df | P-value |
Model 3 HR (95%CI) |
Wald, df | P-value |
Model 4 HR (95%CI) |
Wald, df | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 → 2013 | Frailty status | ||||||||||||
N = 839 | Robust (471) | Ref (1.000) | Ref (1.000) | Ref (1.000) | Ref (1.000) | ||||||||
Pre-frail (343) | 1.316 (0.959, 1.805) |
2.9,1 | 0.089 | 1.366 (0.991, 1.882) |
3.624,1 | 0.057 | 1.380 (0.957, 1.989) |
2.972,1 | 0.085 | 1.395 (0.966, 2.013) |
3.155,1 | 0.076 | |
Frailty (25) | 2.162 (0.945, 4.948) |
3.332,1 | 0.068 | 2.207 (0.943, 5.168) |
3.326,1 | 0.068 | 2.487 (0.948, 6.519) |
3.431,1 | 0.064 | 2.458 (0.933, 6.479) |
3.308,1 | 0.069 | |
P-trend | 1.366 (1.041, 1.793) |
5.046,1 | 0.025 | 1.404 (1.064, 1.853) |
5.756,1 | 0.016 | 1.443 (1.053, 1.978) |
5.2,1 | 0.023 | 1.451 (1.057, 1.990) |
5.316,1 | 0.021 | |
2011 → 2015 | Frailty status | ||||||||||||
N = 788 | Robust (447) | Ref (1.000) | Ref (1.000) | Ref (1.000) | Ref (1.000) | ||||||||
Pre-frail (319) | 1.386 (1.019, 1.885) |
4.33,1 | 0.037 | 1.450 (1.06, 1.983) |
5.417,1 | 0.020 | 1.400 (1.018, 1.923) |
4.295,1 | 0.038 | 1.397 (1.017, 1.920) |
4.249,1 | 0.039 | |
Frailty (22) | 2.492 (1.054,5.893) |
4.326,1 | 0.038 | 2.939 (1.208, 7.153) |
5.644,1 | 0.018 | 3.036 (1.231, 7.487) |
5.815,1 | 0.016 | 2.992 (1.210, 7.397) |
5.63,1 | 0.018 | |
P-trend | 1.443 (1.103, 1.886) |
7.178,1 | 0.007 | 1.525 (1.159, 2.006) |
9.08,1 | 0.003 | 1.494 (1.130, 1.976) |
7.94,1 | 0.005 | 1.489 (1.126, 1.969) |
7.775,1 | 0.005 |
Model 1, unadjusted; Model 2, adjusted for age, sex, educational levels, marital status, live place; Model 3, adjusted for age, sex, educational levels, marital status, live place, current smoking, alcohol drinking, activities, chronic diseases; Model 4, adjusted for age, sex, educational levels, marital status, live place, current smoking, alcohol drinking, activities, chronic diseases, BMI.